True or false: The Articles of Confederation had to be

replaced because it created a weak central government
that needed to be strengthened.
(1 point)
True
False

True

True. The Articles of Confederation did indeed have to be replaced because it created a weak central government that needed to be strengthened.

The Articles of Confederation, which were the first constitution of the United States, established a decentralized system of government that gave most of the power to the individual states. This meant that the central government lacked the authority and resources necessary to effectively govern the nation.

To arrive at this answer, one can study the historical context of the Articles of Confederation and understand the reasons why it failed. Additionally, one can read about the criticisms and limitations of the Articles, such as the inability to enforce laws, lack of taxation power, and difficulty in coordinating defense and foreign relations. Overall, it was clear that a stronger central government was needed for the functioning of the new nation, which ultimately led to the drafting and ratification of the United States Constitution in 1787.

True. The Articles of Confederation created a weak central government that lacked sufficient power to effectively govern the country. This weakness led to several problems and conflicts, such as economic instability and difficulties in maintaining national security. As a result, the need for a stronger central government led to the replacement of the Articles of Confederation with the United States Constitution.