Use the phrase to answer the question.
The Great Depression led to many significant consequences, but with regard to the issue of territorial expansion, the League of Nations was a major contributor to tensions between nations and states.
Which of the following assesses the credibility of the League of Nations during the 1930s as a result?
(1 point)
Responses
The League of Nations granted Austria and Czechoslovakia to German Allied powers.
The League of Nations was unable to stop internal disputes between Britain and France.
The League of Nations used the U.S. as the primary arbiter of international disputes.
The League of Nations was unable to stop Japanese, Italian, or German international aggressions.
The League of Nations was unable to stop Japanese, Italian, or German international aggressions.
The correct answer is:
The League of Nations was unable to stop Japanese, Italian, or German international aggressions.
The correct answer is:
The League of Nations was unable to stop Japanese, Italian, or German international aggressions.
Explanation on how to get the answer:
To assess the credibility of the League of Nations during the 1930s, we need to look for evidence of its effectiveness (or lack thereof) in dealing with international tensions and aggressions. The question provides several options, and to find the correct answer, we need to eliminate the ones that are not relevant to the League's effectiveness in preventing territorial expansion.
Option 1 states that the League of Nations granted Austria and Czechoslovakia to German Allied powers. While this is related to territorial expansion, it does not involve the League's credibility in dealing with the consequences of the Great Depression. Therefore, we can eliminate this option.
Option 2 states that the League of Nations was unable to stop internal disputes between Britain and France. This option refers to internal disputes between these nations but not international territorial expansion. Therefore, we can eliminate this option as well.
Option 3 states that the League of Nations used the U.S. as the primary arbiter of international disputes. This option does not provide evidence of the League's ability or inability to address territorial expansion and international tensions. Therefore, we can eliminate this option.
Option 4 states that the League of Nations was unable to stop Japanese, Italian, or German international aggressions. This option directly addresses the League's failure to prevent territorial expansion and aggression during the 1930s, which aligns with the theme of the question. Therefore, this is the correct answer.
By logically evaluating the options and eliminating the ones that are not relevant or do not address territorial expansion, we can determine that the answer is that the League of Nations was unable to stop Japanese, Italian, or German international aggressions.