Which of the following would not be a primary source for a feature story about a controversial art exhibit coming to the local museum:
(1 point)
Responses
An interview with the artist
An interview with the artist
An email from the museum’s director
An email from the museum’s director
An online critique of the art work
An online critique of the art work
Thoughts from people who visit the museum
Thoughts from people who visit the museum
The correct answer is "Thoughts from people who visit the museum." This response is the only option that does not qualify as a primary source for a feature story about a controversial art exhibit coming to the local museum. Primary sources are firsthand accounts or original materials that provide direct evidence or information about a topic. Therefore, options (1) An interview with the artist, (2) An email from the museum's director, and (3) An online critique of the artwork are all examples of primary sources.
The correct answer is: an online critique of the art work.
To answer this question, it is important to understand what a primary source is. A primary source is an original, first-hand account or artifact related to the topic being studied. It provides direct evidence or insight into a particular event or phenomenon.
In the context of a feature story about a controversial art exhibit coming to the local museum, primary sources would typically include materials directly related to the exhibit and its creators or organizers.
Let's go through each option:
1. An interview with the artist: This would be considered a primary source as it involves directly speaking to the artist and gathering their firsthand perspective and insights about their work.
2. An email from the museum’s director: This would also be considered a primary source since it is an original communication from a key figure involved in organizing the exhibit. The director's email could reveal important details, intentions, or policies related to the exhibit.
3. An online critique of the artwork: This option is not a primary source. An online critique is a secondary source that provides interpretations or opinions about the artwork by someone who may not be directly involved with the exhibit. While it can offer insights and perspectives, it does not provide firsthand information about the art or the exhibit itself.
4. Thoughts from people who visit the museum: This option is not considered a primary source either. It would fall under the category of public opinion or feedback and does not provide direct evidence or firsthand information about the exhibit or its controversies.
Therefore, the correct answer is "An online critique of the art work".