Which is the best conclusion you can draw from the fact that the main way to get goods was through trade?(1 point) Responses Different settlements had access to different resources. Different settlements had access to different resources. The Europeans had different money than Indigenous peoples. The Europeans had different money than Indigenous peoples. Trading was faster than using money. Trading was faster than using money. No central form of money was used during this time period.
The best conclusion is that different settlements had access to different resources.
The best conclusion that can be drawn from the fact that the main way to get goods was through trade is that no central form of money was used during this time period.
The best conclusion that can be drawn from the fact that the main way to get goods was through trade is that different settlements had access to different resources.
To arrive at this conclusion, it is important to understand that trade refers to the exchange of goods between different parties. In a scenario where trade is the primary means of acquiring goods, it suggests that each settlement or group involved in trading possesses certain resources or goods that are desirable to others, but may be lacking in other resources themselves. Therefore, they engage in trade to obtain the goods they need from other settlements that have those resources.
To analyze this further, one can consider the concept of comparative advantage. Different settlements would have varying advantages in producing certain goods or accessing particular resources due to their geographical location, climate, natural resources, or specialized skills. Through trade, they can capitalize on these advantages and exchange surplus goods for items they lack.
Thus, the conclusion that can be drawn is that different settlements had access to different resources, leading to the reliance on trade as the primary means of acquiring goods.