Which BEST explains why early print sources have very few illustrations?

(1 point)
Responses

They requires a lot of ink, which was very costly.
They requires a lot of ink, which was very costly.

They were the most expensive part of the printing process.
They were the most expensive part of the printing process.

Most events did not require images to be clearly understood.
Most events did not require images to be clearly understood.

Society at the time did not trust information that came from images.

They requires a lot of ink, which was very costly.

The most correct answer is: They required a lot of ink, which was very costly.

The correct answer is (2) They were the most expensive part of the printing process.

Early print sources had very few illustrations primarily because they were expensive to produce. In the early days of printing, the most time-consuming and costly part of the process was creating illustrations or images. This was due to the need for skilled artists to manually create the illustrations, as well as the additional materials and resources required, such as ink and specialized printing equipment.

Illustrations required much more effort, time, and resources compared to the actual printing of text. Therefore, early print sources focused more on conveying information through text rather than visuals. The expenses associated with producing illustrations made it impractical for most publications to include a large number of images.

It is important to note that the other options provided are not correct explanations for why early print sources had few illustrations. The first option mentions that illustrations required a lot of ink, which was costly. While ink expenses were certainly a factor, it was not the main reason for the scarcity of illustrations. The third option suggests that most events did not require images to be understood, but this does not explain why there were few illustrations overall. The fourth option about societal mistrust of images is not accurate either, as illustrations were not inherently mistrusted during that time period.