What general principle was established with the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision?
(1 point)
Responses
States could not prevent African Americans from voting.
States could not prevent African Americans from voting.
States could be punished with decreased congressional representation if they did not allow African Americans to vote.
States could be punished with decreased congressional representation if they did not allow African Americans to vote.
States could require separate facilities for African Americans as long as the facilities were equal.
States could require separate facilities for African Americans as long as the facilities were equal.
States could not use poll taxes and literacy tests to establish voting eligibility.
States could require separate facilities for African Americans as long as the facilities were equal.
The general principle established with the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision was that states could require separate facilities for African Americans as long as the facilities were equal.
The general principle that was established with the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision was that states could require separate facilities for African Americans as long as the facilities were equal.
To arrive at this answer, one should be familiar with the Plessy v. Ferguson case. In 1896, Homer Plessy, an African American man, intentionally violated a Louisiana law that required separate train cars for white and black passengers. Plessy argued that the law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The case made its way to the Supreme Court, where the court ruled against Plessy.
To find the answer to the question, one could start by recalling the details of the Plessy v. Ferguson case. Then, peruse the available responses and identify the one that aligns with the outcome of the Supreme Court decision. In this case, the correct answer is "States could require separate facilities for African Americans as long as the facilities were equal."