Which of the following statements best hypothesizes why the Constitution provides for expressed powers?(1 point)
Responses
Congress needed the power to pass laws involving taxation.
Congress needed the power to pass laws involving taxation.
Congress needed the power to add amendments to the Constitution in the future.
Congress needed the power to add amendments to the Constitution in the future.
Congress needed unlimited power, so the Framers provided for that.
Congress needed unlimited power, so the Framers provided for that.
Congress needed sufficient power to govern, but not unlimited power.
Congress needed sufficient power to govern, but not unlimited power.
The correct statement is:
Congress needed sufficient power to govern, but not unlimited power.
The statement that best hypothesizes why the Constitution provides for expressed powers is: Congress needed sufficient power to govern, but not unlimited power.
To arrive at this answer, we can analyze the purpose and intent behind the Constitution, as well as the principles on which it was founded. The Constitution establishes a system of government in which power is distributed among different branches - the legislative, executive, and judicial branches - to prevent any one part of the government from becoming too powerful. This concept is known as separation of powers.
Expressed powers, also known as enumerated powers, are the specific powers granted to Congress in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. These powers outline the areas in which Congress is authorized to act and legislate. By providing for expressed powers, the Framers of the Constitution intended to give Congress the necessary authority to effectively govern the nation while also ensuring that its powers are limited and defined.
The other statements are not accurate because:
1. The statement about Congress needing the power to pass laws involving taxation is too specific and does not encompass the broader purpose of the Constitution.
2. While Congress does have the power to add amendments to the Constitution, this is not the primary reason for providing for expressed powers.
3. The assertion that Congress needed unlimited power goes against the fundamental principles of the Constitution, namely a system of checks and balances and limiting government authority.
Therefore, the statement that best explains why the Constitution provides for expressed powers is that Congress needed sufficient power to govern, but not unlimited power.