In 1–2 sentences, hypothesize why the Articles of Confederation was replaced by the U.S. Constitution and how the expressed powers and elastic clause addressed concerns regarding the Articles.
The Articles of Confederation was replaced by the U.S. Constitution primarily due to its weak central government, and the expressed powers and elastic clause in the Constitution addressed concerns by providing a stronger framework for the federal government to address issues and adapt to changing circumstances.
The Articles of Confederation were replaced by the U.S. Constitution due to the weaknesses in the former, which led to a weak central government and economic instability. The expressed powers granted to the federal government and the elastic clause provided flexibility in addressing these concerns by giving the government authority to address issues not explicitly stated in the Constitution.
The Articles of Confederation was replaced by the U.S. Constitution because the former was deemed too weak to effectively govern the newly formed United States, and the expressed powers and elastic clause in the Constitution addressed these concerns by providing a stronger central government and allowing for flexibility and adaptability in legislation and governance. To understand this, you can research the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and compare them to the structure and powers outlined in the U.S. Constitution.
