Which of the following would be an exception to the right to peacefully assemble?(1 point)
Responses
A group of protestors marching and promoting violence in a neighborhood.
A group of protestors marching and promoting violence in a neighborhood.
A political interest group holds a meeting in a private home.
A political interest group holds a meeting in a private home.
A group of people protesting increased fees block the entrance to a bank.
A group of people protesting increased fees block the entrance to a bank.
A group of union members goes on strike against a public utility company.
A group of protestors marching and promoting violence in a neighborhood.
A group of protestors marching and promoting violence in a neighborhood would be an exception to the right to peacefully assemble.
The exception to the right to peacefully assemble would be the first response: "A group of protestors marching and promoting violence in a neighborhood." This is because the right to peacefully assemble does not include the right to engage in or promote violent activities.
To arrive at this answer, consider the definition of the right to peacefully assemble. It refers to the freedom of individuals to gather together for a common purpose, express their opinions, and engage in peaceful demonstrations or protests. However, this right does not extend to those who advocate or engage in violence.
By comparing each response to the definition, it becomes clear that a group of protestors promoting violence in a neighborhood would not be protected by the right to peaceful assembly.
Analyze the reason that the Supreme Court found the burning of a flag to be protected free speech as it did in Texas v. Johnson.(1 point)
Responses
This action is symbolic speech. The action symbolizes a viewpoint.
This action is symbolic speech. The action symbolizes a viewpoint.
This action did not defame or insult anyone. It created no harm.
This action did not defame or insult anyone. It created no harm.
This action is legal as long as it is done in a respectful manner in order to dispose of an old flag.
This action is legal as long as it is done in a respectful manner in order to dispose of an old flag.
This action, if done on private property, is within the rights of a private citizen.
This action, if done on private property, is within the rights of a private citizen.
The reason that the Supreme Court found the burning of a flag to be protected free speech in Texas v. Johnson is because it is considered symbolic speech. The action of burning the flag is seen as a form of expression that symbolizes a particular viewpoint or message. This falls under the protections of the First Amendment, which safeguards the freedom of speech, even when it is controversial or offensive.
The Court's decision was based on the understanding that the action of flag burning did not defame or insult anyone, and it did not create any direct harm. The fact that it is a symbolic expression of a viewpoint is what deemed it protected speech.
It is important to note that the decision in Texas v. Johnson specifically addresses the act of flag burning as a form of political protest and expression. Other actions involving the flag, such as using it for disrespectful purposes or as a means of inciting violence, may not receive the same constitutional protection.
Thus, the most accurate response would be: "This action is symbolic speech. The action symbolizes a viewpoint."
Based on the Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines, it would be legal for you to wear an armband to school in order to protest an action taken by our government if it did not create a distraction. What is the basis for this?(1 point)
Responses
freedom to petition
freedom to petition
Establishment Clause
Establishment Clause
freedom to assemble peacefully
freedom to assemble peacefully
protected symbolic speech
The basis for the legality of wearing an armband to school as a form of protest, as established in Tinker v. Des Moines, is protected symbolic speech. The Supreme Court ruled that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." In other words, students have the right to express their opinions and engage in symbolic speech, such as wearing an armband, as long as it does not cause a substantial disruption to the educational environment.
This ruling is based on the interpretation and protection of the First Amendment, which safeguards the freedom of speech and expression. The Court recognized the importance of allowing individuals, including students, to engage in peaceful forms of protest or expression to communicate their viewpoints.
Thus, the correct response is: "protected symbolic speech."
Where can a description of U.S. citizens’ civil liberties be found?(1 point)
Responses
Preamble to the Constitution
Preamble to the Constitution
Bill of Rights
Bill of Rights
Pledge of Allegiance
Pledge of Allegiance
Declaration of Independence
A description of U.S. citizens' civil liberties can be found in the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, which specifies and protects individual rights and freedoms. It outlines various civil liberties, including freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to bear arms, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, among others.
Therefore, the correct response is: "Bill of Rights."
The statement below was made by Thomas Jefferson in a 1786 letter to John Jay.
"...our liberty, which cannot be guarded but by the freedom of the press..."
Why should this freedom be protected?
(1 point)
Responses
to provide the news media with a guaranteed profit
to provide the news media with a guaranteed profit
to keep the government from becoming the primary information source
to keep the government from becoming the primary information source
to keep the news media from controlling the political process
to keep the news media from controlling the political process
to provide the government with an accurate information source