Which of the following best analyzes the fragmentation of
Sudan and South Sudan? (1 point)
South Sudan wanted to fragment from Sudan because it
won a civil war against it.
South Sudan wanted to fragment because of political
oppression and cultural differences from the rest of
Sudan.
South Sudan wanted to fragment because it benefited
more from British colonialism than the rest of Sudan.
South Sudan wanted to fragment because of economic
advantages that they had over the rest of the country.
The best analysis of the fragmentation of Sudan and South Sudan is: South Sudan wanted to fragment because of political oppression and cultural differences from the rest of Sudan.
The option that best analyzes the fragmentation of Sudan and South Sudan is:
South Sudan wanted to fragment because of political oppression and cultural differences from the rest of Sudan.
To determine which answer option best analyzes the fragmentation of Sudan and South Sudan, we need to carefully evaluate each option.
Option 1 states that South Sudan wanted to fragment from Sudan because it won a civil war against it. While it is true that South Sudan gained independence from Sudan after a civil war, this option only focuses on the outcome of the civil war and does not explain the underlying reasons for the desire to fragment.
Option 3 suggests that South Sudan wanted to fragment because it benefited more from British colonialism than the rest of Sudan. This option does not provide a sufficient explanation for the fragmentation. While it acknowledges a historical factor, it does not consider other important factors that played a role in the fragmentation.
Option 4 argues that South Sudan wanted to fragment because of economic advantages over the rest of the country. While it is true that there were economic disparities between South Sudan and Sudan, economic factors alone do not fully capture the complexity of the fragmentation.
Option 2 states that South Sudan wanted to fragment because of political oppression and cultural differences from the rest of Sudan. This option takes into account important factors such as political oppression and cultural differences, which were key drivers of the desire for independence in South Sudan. Cultural differences and political oppression played a significant role in igniting tensions and fueled the calls for self-determination and independence.
Overall, option 2, which highlights political oppression and cultural differences as reasons for fragmentation, provides a more comprehensive analysis of the fragmentation of Sudan and South Sudan.