How is a royal colony an example of self-government?
A. A lord proprietor appointed their officials.
B. A royal colony elected its own legislative body.
C. Laws were created without the king’s counsel.
D. Laws were created by lord proprietors.
B. A royal colony elected its own legislative body.
A royal colony is not an example of self-government.
The correct answer is A. A lord proprietor appointed their officials.
To understand this, let's break down the options and explain each one:
A. A lord proprietor appointed their officials: This is the correct answer. In a royal colony, the king granted a charter to a lord proprietor who then appointed officials to govern the colony. This meant that the officials were chosen by someone within the colony itself, rather than directly by the king, giving the colony a certain level of self-government.
B. A royal colony elected its own legislative body: This option is not correct. In a royal colony, the legislative body was typically not elected by the colonists, but rather appointed by the lord proprietor or the king. Therefore, it does not demonstrate self-government.
C. Laws were created without the king's counsel: This option is not correct. In a royal colony, the king or his council usually had the authority to approve or disapprove laws passed by the legislative body. Therefore, laws were not created without the king's counsel.
D. Laws were created by lord proprietors: This option is not correct. While the lord proprietors played a role in governance and could create laws for the colony, it is not representative of self-government since the lord proprietor was appointed by the king and not elected by the colonists.
In summary, a royal colony is an example of self-government because a lord proprietor appointed their officials, giving the colony some level of autonomy in governing itself.