Informational Text Analysis Online Practice Complete this assessment to review what you’ve learned. It will not count toward your grade. 1 of 121 of 12 Items Question Which analogy shows a part-whole relationship?(1 point) Responses A fin is to a fish as singing is to a bird. A fin is to a fish as singing is to a bird. A fin is to a fish as flight is to a bird. A fin is to a fish as flight is to a bird. A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird. A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird. A fin is to a fish as a nest is to a bird.
A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird.
The analogy that shows a part-whole relationship is: A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird.
To determine which analogy shows a part-whole relationship, we need to understand what a part-whole relationship means. In a part-whole relationship, one element is a part or component of another element.
Let's analyze each analogy given:
A fin is to a fish as singing is to a bird. This analogy does not show a part-whole relationship. Instead, it compares two separate actions or traits of different animals.
A fin is to a fish as flight is to a bird. This analogy also does not show a part-whole relationship. It compares two actions or traits associated with different animals.
A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird. This analogy demonstrates a part-whole relationship. Just like a fin is a part of a fish, a wing is a part of a bird.
A fin is to a fish as a nest is to a bird. This analogy does not show a part-whole relationship. It compares a physical feature of one animal (a fin) to a behavioral characteristic of another animal (a nest).
Therefore, the correct answer is: A fin is to a fish as a wing is to a bird.