How would Samuel A. Worcester most likely view the end result of the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people? He would be happy because he wanted the Cherokee to be moved to the west, he would be surprised because he expected the supreme court to rule his favor, he would be disappointed because he argued for the Cherokee rights to their land, he would be surprised because he evicted Georgian to change their mind about the Indian removal
Based on the information provided, Samuel A. Worcester would most likely be disappointed because he argued for the Cherokee's rights to their land.
Samuel A. Worcester was a well-known missionary and advocate for the Cherokee people during the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee nation. Based on his position and arguments, he would most likely be disappointed with the end result of the legal battle. Worcester fought for the Cherokee people's rights to their land and opposed their forced removal to the west. He believed that the Cherokees should be able to remain on their ancestral land in Georgia. Therefore, if the legal battle resulted in the Cherokee's removal, it would go against his stance and likely leave him disappointed.
To determine how Samuel A. Worcester would most likely view the end result of the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people, we need to examine his views and arguments throughout the case.
Samuel A. Worcester was an 19th-century American missionary who worked closely with the Cherokee Nation. He believed that the Cherokee people had the right to their land and vehemently opposed their forced removal by the government. In fact, he took part in the legal battle by challenging the state of Georgia's jurisdiction over Cherokee territory.
Worcester's ultimate goal was to establish the legal rights and sovereignty of the Cherokee Nation within their ancestral lands. He also hoped to set a precedent that would protect the rights of indigenous peoples across the United States.
Given his beliefs and involvement, it is safe to say that Samuel A. Worcester would be disappointed with the end result of the legal battle. This is because the Supreme Court, in the landmark case Worcester v. Georgia (1832), ruled in favor of Worcester and the Cherokee Nation, recognizing their right to self-governance and protection of their lands.
However, despite the favorable ruling, Georgia and President Andrew Jackson chose to disregard the Supreme Court's decision, and the forced removal of the Cherokee people continued through the infamous Trail of Tears.
Therefore, Worcester would likely be disappointed and dismayed that his legal victory did not lead to the protection of Cherokee rights and the prevention of their removal from their ancestral lands. His efforts to advocate for the Cherokee and their rights were ultimately undermined by the actions of the state and federal government.
In conclusion, Samuel A. Worcester would most likely be disappointed with the end result of the legal battle between Georgia and the Cherokee people, as it did not achieve his goal of securing the rights and sovereignty of the Cherokee Nation.