Why did the Dust Bowl of the 1930s increase migration in the U.S.?(1 point)
Responses
It was a sudden-onset event that led to voluntary migration.
It was a sudden-onset event that led to voluntary migration.
It was a slow-onset change that led to forced migration.
It was a slow-onset change that led to forced migration.
It was a slow-onset change that led to voluntary migration.
It was a slow-onset change that led to voluntary migration.
It was a sudden-onset event that led to forced migration.
It was a sudden-onset event that led to forced migration.
The Dust Bowl of the 1930s increased migration in the U.S. due to a slow-onset change that led to forced migration.
The correct answer is: It was a sudden-onset event that led to forced migration.
Explanation: The Dust Bowl of the 1930s was a sudden-onset event characterized by a severe drought and intense dust storms that severely damaged the agricultural lands in the Midwest, primarily in the Great Plains region of the United States. The combination of drought, poor land management practices, and high winds created massive dust storms that caused significant soil erosion and led to the loss of fertile topsoil.
As a result, farmers were unable to grow crops and sustain their livelihoods. The severe economic hardships caused by the Dust Bowl forced many farmers to abandon their farms and seek employment and opportunities in other regions. This phenomenon, known as forced migration, occurred as individuals and families were displaced and compelled to move in search of better conditions and survival.
The impact of the Dust Bowl on migration patterns was significant. Many families left their homes and farms in search of work and better living conditions, particularly in the agricultural regions of California and other western states. This mass exodus of people from the affected areas increased migration within the United States.