The Supreme Court case of JEB v. Alabama ex. rel. T.B. involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool. Analyze the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?
A. Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
B. The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause
C. the attorneys used secret trial proceedings.
D. Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
D. Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994) is:
D. Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
To analyze the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994), let's first review the background of the case. In this case, prosecutors in Alabama used peremptory challenges to systematically exclude male potential jurors from serving on the jury in a child support case. The defendant, J.E.B., argued that this practice violated his rights under the Equal Protection Clause.
Now, let's consider the options provided:
A. Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
B. The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause.
C. The attorneys used secret trial proceedings.
D. Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
Among the options, option D seems to be the most likely reason that the justices ruled as they did. The case revolved around the issue of peremptory challenges based on gender, and the justices' ruling primarily focused on the constitutionality of excluding potential jurors based on their gender. The case ultimately held that peremptory challenges based on gender were indeed a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Therefore, the correct answer is D. Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.