What made the malcontents different from other groups in colonial Georgia? (1 point) Responses Their land was not productive Their land was not productive They were denied religious freedom They were denied religious freedom They had trouble with the Yamacraw Indians They had trouble with the Yamacraw Indians Most of them paid their own way with little assistance Most of them paid their own way with little assistance

The malcontents in colonial Georgia were different from other groups mainly because they were denied religious freedom. They were a group of settlers who were unhappy with the strict rules and regulations enforced by James Oglethorpe, the founder of the colony. The malcontents wanted more personal freedom, especially in terms of their religious practices.

The malcontents were a distinct group in colonial Georgia for several reasons. One point of difference was that their land was not productive. This means that the land they owned or were allocated in Georgia did not yield good agricultural or economic results. Another point of distinction was that they were denied religious freedom. This means that they were not allowed to practice their preferred religion or faced restrictions in doing so. Additionally, they had trouble with the Yamacraw Indians, which implies that they had conflicts or difficulties in their interactions with this Native American tribe. Lastly, a key difference was that most of them paid their own way with little assistance. This suggests that the malcontents were self-reliant and financially supported themselves, relying less on external assistance compared to other groups in colonial Georgia.

The malcontents in colonial Georgia were different from other groups for several reasons:

1. Their land was not productive: Unlike other groups, the malcontents had difficulties with their land, which was not productive. This may have hampered their ability to establish successful settlements and sustain themselves.

2. They were denied religious freedom: The malcontents also faced challenges in terms of religious freedom. They were not afforded the same rights to practice their religion as other groups, which likely caused discontentment and frustration among the malcontents.

3. They had trouble with the Yamacraw Indians: Another factor that set the malcontents apart was their troubled relationship with the Yamacraw Indians. It's likely that they encountered conflicts and disagreements, which further added to the challenges they faced in colonial Georgia.

4. Most of them paid their own way with little assistance: Unlike some other groups in colonial Georgia, the malcontents largely relied on their own means and received minimal assistance. This self-sufficiency and independence may have contributed to their unique experience and perspective within the colony.