Which is one advantage of maps over aerial photographs as a way of understanding Earth's surface?
(1 point)
O There is too much distortion in a photograph.
O Maps show more features than photographs.
Photographs show only the most important features for a given purpose.
Photographs do not give an accurate picture of the region they show
Maps show more features than photographs.
To determine the advantage of maps over aerial photographs when understanding Earth's surface, we will analyze each option:
1. There is too much distortion in a photograph: This option highlights a disadvantage of aerial photographs, rather than an advantage of maps.
2. Maps show more features than photographs: This option compares the level of detail presented on maps with that of aerial photographs. Maps, being a representation that includes diverse features and information, tend to show more details and attributes than aerial photographs.
3. Photographs show only the most important features for a given purpose: This option suggests that aerial photographs selectively display only the essential features relevant to a specific purpose or objective. However, this statement does not explain the advantage of maps over aerial photographs.
4. Photographs do not give an accurate picture of the region they show: This option implies that aerial photographs are not entirely accurate representations of the regions they depict. While aerial photographs could potentially have limitations such as distortion or omission, this statement does not focus on the advantage of maps over aerial photographs.
Considering these options, it becomes evident that the correct answer is:
- Maps show more features than photographs.
To understand Earth's surface, maps provide a comprehensive representation of various features and details, allowing for a better understanding of geographical characteristics and spatial relationships compared to aerial photographs which may have a limited level of detail.