Summarize why Judith Herrin believes the fall of Constantinople was a turning point for Western history.(1 point)
Responses
Scholars fled with knowledge that sparked the Renaissance in Europe.
Scholars fled with knowledge that sparked the Renaissance in Europe.
It meant that cannons would not work for sieges in the future.
It meant that cannons would not work for sieges in the future.
It led to the voyages of discovery by Columbus because trade was blocked.
It led to the voyages of discovery by Columbus because trade was blocked.
It marked the beginning of the Third Rome in Europe
and the decline of the Byzantine Empire.
- Judith Herrin believes that the fall of Constantinople was a turning point for Western history because scholars fled with knowledge that sparked the Renaissance in Europe.
- She also argues that it meant that cannons would not work for sieges in the future.
- Additionally, Herrin believes that it led to the voyages of discovery by Columbus because trade was blocked.
- Finally, she suggests that it marked the beginning of the Third Rome in Europe.
Judith Herrin believes that the fall of Constantinople was a turning point for Western history because it had several significant consequences. One of these consequences was that scholars fled from Constantinople with important knowledge, including ancient Greek and Roman texts, which sparked the Renaissance in Europe. These scholars brought with them a wealth of intellectual and cultural knowledge that helped shape the development of art, literature, and scientific thought in Western Europe.
Additionally, the fall of Constantinople had military implications. It demonstrated that the traditional defenses of fortified cities, such as walls, were no longer sufficient to protect against the use of cannon fire. This realization led to advancements in military technology and tactics, as well as changes in the way cities were designed and defended.
Furthermore, the fall of Constantinople also had geopolitical consequences. It blocked the direct overland trade routes between Europe and Asia, which had been controlled by the Byzantine Empire. This trade disruption incentivized explorers like Christopher Columbus to find alternative routes to Asia, ultimately leading to the voyages of discovery and the Age of Exploration.
Finally, some also argue that the fall of Constantinople marked the end of the Byzantine Empire and the beginning of the Third Rome in Europe. This idea, propagated by the Russian ruler Ivan III, positioned Moscow as the successor to Rome and Constantinople and laid the foundation for the future development of the Russian Empire.
In summary, Judith Herrin believes that the fall of Constantinople was a turning point for Western history because it resulted in the transfer of knowledge that fueled the Renaissance, led to advancements in military technology, prompted the voyages of discovery, and had significant geopolitical implications.