Why does the author of The Call of the Wild describe Buck’s progress as “retrogression
• Buck’s behavior was becoming more and more evil
• Buck was returning to his ancient instinctual roots
• Buck’s morals were becoming fine-tuned
Based on the given options, the most likely reason why the author describes Buck's progress as "retrogression" is because Buck was returning to his ancient instinctual roots. This means that Buck was going back to a more primal and savage version of himself, regressing from the domesticated and civilized dog he had become. The author may be emphasizing Buck's transformation back into his wild and natural state as the story progresses.
The author of The Call of the Wild describes Buck's progress as "retrogression" because Buck was returning to his ancient instinctual roots. As the story unfolds, Buck gradually undergoes a transformation from a domesticated pet to a wild and primal creature. This transition is represented by his growing adaptation to the harsh and brutal environment of the Klondike, where he is forced to rely on his natural instincts for survival. Throughout the novel, Buck's behavior evolves in accordance with these ancestral instincts, as he becomes more aggressive, cunning, and dominant. Therefore, the author uses the term "retrogression" to emphasize the regression of Buck's behavior from a domesticated and civilized state to a more primal and instinctual one.
To determine why the author of The Call of the Wild describes Buck's progress as "retrogression," we can examine the events and behaviors described in the novel. Reading the book carefully will help us understand the author's intention and the changes Buck undergoes. By doing so, we can identify the most appropriate answer choice.
In The Call of the Wild, we witness Buck's journey from a civilized and domesticated dog to an untamed and instinct-driven creature, as he is gradually drawn into the wild and harsh environment of the Yukon during the Gold Rush. Throughout the story, Buck experiences a transformation that can be seen as a regression or "retrogression."
The first option, "Buck's behavior was becoming more and more evil," might not accurately capture the author's intention. While Buck becomes more aggressive and ruthless for survival, this doesn't necessarily equate to evil behavior. Buck's actions are driven by his instinctual nature and the necessity to adapt in the wild, rather than moral choices.
The second option, "Buck was returning to his ancient instinctual roots," aligns closely with the author's portrayal of Buck's journey. As Buck adapts to his environment, he taps into his primal instincts, which have been dormant during his domesticated life. He reverts to his ancestral state, relying on his innate instincts and survival skills.
The third option, "Buck's morals were becoming fine-tuned," is not an accurate depiction of the changes Buck undergoes. In fact, Buck's morals are not the focus of his transformation. Instead, the story highlights his physical and behavioral adaptation to the wild environment.
Therefore, the correct answer is the second option, "Buck was returning to his ancient instinctual roots," as it aligns with the author's portrayal of Buck's progression in The Call of the Wild.