Ben and Peter are playing horseshoes been texting first tournament and his horse. She wants 3/4 of the way to the Target. Peter takes the next turn in his horse. She lives past the target which statement best explains the results Peter use a horse. She was more mass, and there was less force them. Being Peter used a horse. She was more mass in through the same force has been. The horses have the same mass, but Peter through with more force than Peter, or the horse shoes, have the same mass, but Peter through with less force than ben

Question

Ben and Peter are playing horseshoes been texting first tournament and his horse. She wants 3/4 of the way to the Target. Peter takes the next turn in his horse. She lives past the target which statement best explains the results Peter use a horse. She was more mass, and there was less force them. Being Peter used a horse. She was more mass in through the same force has been. The horses have the same mass, but Peter through with more force than Peter, or the horse shoes, have the same mass, but Peter through with less force than ben

Answer 1

The statement that best explains the results is: The horses have the same mass, but Peter threw with more force than Ben.

Answer 2

The statement that best explains the results is: The horses have the same mass, but Peter threw with more force than Ben.

Answer 3

To determine the best explanation for the results of Peter using a horseshoe, we need to consider the concepts of mass and force.

Mass refers to the amount of matter in an object, while force is a push or pull that can change the motion of an object.

In this scenario, it is mentioned that Ben's horse reached 3/4 of the way to the target. This implies that Ben applied a certain force to the horseshoe, resulting in its travel distance.

When Peter takes his turn, two statements are given:

1. "She lives past the target which statement best explains the results. Peter used a horse. She was more mass, and there was less force them."

2. "Being Peter used a horse. She was more mass in through the same force has been."

Based on this information, we can eliminate the possibility that the horses have the same mass since both statements indicate that Peter's horse has a different mass. So, let's focus on the remaining options.

Statement 1 suggests that Peter's horse had more mass, but there was less force. If Peter used a horseshoe with more mass and applied less force, it is unlikely to result in the horseshoe traveling further than Ben's.

Statement 2 implies that Peter's horse had more mass and applied the same force as Ben. This explanation seems more reasonable because if Peter's horse had more mass and the same force was applied, it could potentially result in the horseshoe travelling a greater distance than Ben's.

Therefore, the best explanation for the results is that the horseshoes have the same mass, but Peter threw with more force than Ben.