Analyze the following scenario. Which of the following statements is true?
“In the past year, the U.S. Government has rolled back previous immigration restrictions. Changes include making immigration benefits easier to access, updating the asylum system, and incorporating a pathway to legalization for illegal immigrants.”
(1 point)
Responses
All three changes are obstacles for migration.
All three changes are obstacles for migration.
Two of the changes are obstacles for migration; one is an opportunity.
Two of the changes are obstacles for migration; one is an opportunity.
Two changes are opportunities; one is a challenge for migration.
Two changes are opportunities; one is a challenge for migration.
All three changes are opportunities for migration.
All three changes are opportunities for migration.
The correct statement is: Two changes are opportunities; one is a challenge for migration.
Based on the given scenario, the correct statement is:
Two changes are opportunities; one is a challenge for migration.
To analyze the scenario and determine which statement is true, we need to understand the meaning of the changes mentioned in the statement and evaluate whether they are obstacles or opportunities for migration.
The given changes are:
1. Making immigration benefits easier to access
2. Updating the asylum system
3. Incorporating a pathway to legalization for illegal immigrants
Let's analyze each change:
1. Making immigration benefits easier to access: This change suggests that the U.S. Government has simplified the process for immigrants to access benefits related to immigration. It could be seen as an opportunity for migration because it implies that immigrants may have better access to resources and support.
2. Updating the asylum system: Updating the asylum system implies changes in how the U.S. Government handles and evaluates asylum claims. It could create both opportunities and challenges for migration depending on the nature of the changes. For example, if the updates provide more protection and fair treatment for asylum-seekers, it could be seen as an opportunity. However, if the updates make it more difficult or restrictive to be granted asylum, it would be considered an obstacle for migration.
3. Incorporating a pathway to legalization for illegal immigrants: This change suggests that the U.S. Government is providing a pathway for illegal immigrants to become legalized residents or citizens. This could be seen as an opportunity for those individuals who were previously undocumented to obtain legal status. However, it could also be seen as a challenge for migration since it implies that illegal immigration would no longer be tolerated, and undocumented immigrants would need to go through a legalization process.
Now, let's evaluate the statements:
Statement 1: "All three changes are obstacles for migration." - This statement is not entirely true because at least one of the changes (making immigration benefits easier to access) is presented as an opportunity and not an obstacle.
Statement 2: "Two of the changes are obstacles for migration; one is an opportunity." - This statement correctly represents the scenario. The first two changes mentioned, updating the asylum system and incorporating a pathway to legalization, could be considered as obstacles for migration, while making immigration benefits easier to access is an opportunity.
Statement 3: "Two changes are opportunities; one is a challenge for migration." - This statement accurately reflects the scenario. Making immigration benefits easier to access and incorporating a pathway to legalization can be seen as opportunities, while updating the asylum system may present challenges for migration.
Statement 4: "All three changes are opportunities for migration." - This statement is not entirely true because updating the asylum system could potentially create challenges for migration.
Therefore, based on the analysis, Statement 3 is the correct answer: "Two changes are opportunities; one is a challenge for migration."