Which of the following offers the best comparison between Hobbes’s and Locke’s perspectives on the divine right of kings?(1 point) Responses As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings. As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings. Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad. Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad. Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs. Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs. Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.
None of the given responses offer an accurate comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings.
The best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings is that Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs, while Locke saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
To determine which of the statements offers the best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings, let's break down each option:
1. Responses As Christians, both accepted the divine right of kings.
This statement suggests that both Hobbes and Locke accepted the divine right of kings due to their Christian beliefs. However, it does not provide any further comparison between their perspectives.
2. Both saw the divine right of kings as unnatural and bad.
This statement suggests that both Hobbes and Locke viewed the divine right of kings as unnatural and undesirable. This perspective aligns with neither Hobbes's nor Locke's actual views.
3. Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs.
This statement correctly reflects Hobbes's perspective. He believed in the necessity of a strong and absolute monarchy to maintain order and prevent chaos within society.
4. Locke supported the divine right of kings because it gave people more freedom.
This statement is incorrect. Locke, in fact, opposed the divine right of kings. He advocated for limited government power and the consent of the governed, emphasizing the natural rights of individuals, such as life, liberty, and property.
Based on the above analysis, the option that offers the best comparison between Hobbes's and Locke's perspectives on the divine right of kings is option 3: "Hobbes supported the divine right of kings as absolute monarchs."