ART: W
WHICH BEST EXPLAINS WHY EARLY PRINT SOURCES HAVE VERY FEW ILLUSTRATION?
a. They requires a lot of ink, which was very costly.
b. They were the most expensive part of the printing process.
c. Most events did not require images to be clearly understood.
d. Society at the time did not trust information that came from images.
The most likely answer would be c. Most events did not require images to be clearly understood. Early print sources typically focused on textual information rather than visual illustrations because written descriptions were sufficient for conveying information. Additionally, the production of images in early printing was time-consuming and costly, making it an impractical option for most publications.
The most likely answer is c. Most events did not require images to be clearly understood. During the early days of print sources, text was considered to be the primary means of communication and information sharing. Visual illustrations were not deemed necessary for conveying the information accurately or effectively.
To determine the best explanation for why early print sources had very few illustrations, we can evaluate each option and consider historical context.
Option a. They require a lot of ink, which was very costly.
This option suggests that the use of ink in printing illustrations was expensive, leading to a lack of illustrations in early print sources. To validate this explanation, one could research the cost of ink during that time period and whether it was a significant deterrent to including illustrations.
Option b. They were the most expensive part of the printing process.
This option implies that illustrations were the costliest aspect of the printing process, which could have made them less likely to be included in early print sources. To confirm this explanation, one could investigate the expenses involved in printing and compare the costs of illustrations to other elements.
Option c. Most events did not require images to be clearly understood.
This option suggests that illustrations were not necessary for understanding most events and information conveyed in early print sources. To assess this explanation, one could examine the content of early print sources and analyze whether illustrations were essential for comprehension.
Option d. Society at the time did not trust information that came from images.
This option proposes that there was a lack of trust in information conveyed through images during the specific time period in question. To evaluate this explanation, one could explore historical attitudes towards images and determine if skepticism or mistrust was significant enough to discourage their inclusion.
By researching and analyzing historical records, texts, and expert opinions, one can determine the most likely explanation for why early print sources had very few illustrations. It's important to consider various factors such as production costs, societal norms, and the purpose of illustrations in order to arrive at a comprehensive understanding.