Which of the following is a reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source?
(1 point)
• A source that historians trust is likely to have true opinions.
© The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.
O Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source.
• The opinions will reveal the identity of the source.
© The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.
The correct answer is (2) The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.
When analyzing a source, historians consider both facts and opinions to gain a comprehensive understanding of the context and perspective of the source. By examining the opinions expressed within a source, historians can gather insights into the emotions, beliefs, and potential biases of the person or group behind the source. This information is valuable in evaluating the reliability and objectivity of the source, which in turn helps historians to form a more well-rounded interpretation of the past.
The correct answer is: (B) The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.
Historians may want to consider opinions along with facts reported by a source because opinions can give insight into the source's perspective, feelings, and potential biases. By understanding the opinions expressed, historians can better analyze the reliability and credibility of the source. This can help historians assess the overall trustworthiness and validity of the information provided. It is important to consider both facts and opinions in historical research to get a complete and nuanced understanding of the past.