Athenian democracy influenced the values of modern-day democracy, but what were the two components that allowed it to operate effectively?

Senate and the House
Deme and Senate
Ecclesia and Deme
Ecclesia and Senate

The correct answer is Ecclesia and Deme.

In Athenian democracy, the Ecclesia was the assembly of all adult male citizens who would gather to make decisions and vote on important matters. It was a direct democracy where citizens could participate directly in decision-making.

The Deme was a local unit or district that citizens belonged to. They would participate in local governance and elect representatives to various government bodies. The Deme provided a sense of community and allowed citizens to have a say in local affairs.

These two components, the Ecclesia and the Deme, allowed Athenian democracy to operate effectively by ensuring broad citizen participation and representation at both the local and central levels of government.

The correct answer is "Ecclesia and Deme."

In the Athenian democracy, there were two main components that allowed it to operate effectively: the Ecclesia and the Deme.

1. Ecclesia: The Ecclesia was the assembly of all eligible citizens in Athens. It served as the primary legislative body in which citizens could participate and make decisions. Any citizen could attend and vote in the Ecclesia, making it a key platform for democratic participation.

2. Deme: A Deme was a local administrative unit in ancient Athens. These units were organized based on geography, with each Deme containing a community of citizens. The Deme acted as the building block of the democratic system, allowing citizens to have direct involvement in decision-making and the governance of their local area.

Together, the Ecclesia and the Deme provided a framework for widespread citizen engagement, ensuring that people had opportunities to participate in decision-making and collectively shape the governance of Athens. These two components were crucial for the functioning of Athenian democracy and have influenced the values and practices of modern-day democracy.

The answer is Ecclesia and Deme.

To understand how Athenian democracy operated effectively, we need to first know what these two components were.

1. Ecclesia: The Ecclesia was the assembly of all eligible citizens of Athens. It was essentially the main decision-making body of Athenian democracy. Any citizen could participate in the Ecclesia by attending the meetings and voting on various matters. This direct participation of citizens in decision-making was a fundamental aspect of Athenian democracy.

2. Deme: A deme was a geographic unit that functioned as a local administrative unit within Athens. Each deme had its own council, called the deme council, composed of citizens who lived in that particular area. The deme council was responsible for local matters and played a crucial role in organizing the political and administrative affairs of Athens.

Now that we understand what Ecclesia and Deme are, we can see how they allowed Athenian democracy to operate effectively.

The Ecclesia ensured that all eligible citizens had a direct say in major decisions concerning the city-state. By allowing citizens to actively participate in the assembly, Athenian democracy promoted inclusivity and political engagement. This direct form of democracy encouraged citizens to take responsibility for their city's affairs, fostering a sense of civic duty and ownership.

The demes, on the other hand, provided a local structure that allowed for effective administration and decision-making. By splitting Athens into smaller demes, the city-state could efficiently manage local matters while ensuring that all citizens had a voice within their respective deme councils. These councils served as intermediaries between the larger assembly (Ecclesia) and the local communities, facilitating communication and coordination.

In summary, the combination of the Ecclesia (assembly) and the demes (local administrative units) allowed Athenian democracy to operate effectively. The Ecclesia ensured broad citizen participation and direct decision-making, while the demes provided a functional local structure for administration and representation.