In 1–2 sentences, explain the Anti-Federalist objections to the necessary and proper clause and the supremacy clause

Anti-Federalists objected to the necessary and proper clause as it granted the federal government excessive power to make laws, and they opposed the supremacy clause as it threatened the sovereignty of individual states by asserting federal authority above state laws.

The Anti-Federalists objected to the necessary and proper clause as they believed it gave too much power to the federal government, allowing it to extend its authority beyond what was deemed necessary. They also had concerns about the supremacy clause, as they feared it would undermine the rights and powers of the states by placing the federal government above them.

The Anti-Federalists objected to the necessary and proper clause because they feared it would grant too much power to the federal government, enabling them to expand their authority beyond what was necessary. Additionally, they opposed the supremacy clause because they believed it would undermine the sovereignty of state governments, reducing their autonomy and independence.