Which of the following is a reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source?
A. A source that historians trust is likely to have true opinions.
B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias
C. Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source.
D. The opinions will reveal the identity of the source
B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias
I meant to put "I will answer myself"
No problem! Here's the correct answer:
B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias
The correct answer is B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias. Historians may want to consider opinions along with facts reported by a source to gain insight into the subjective perspective and potential biases of the source. Examining opinions can help uncover underlying motives, beliefs, and values that may influence the facts presented. This analysis allows historians to critically evaluate the reliability and credibility of the source.
The correct answer is B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.
When studying historical sources, historians not only look at the facts reported but also consider the opinions expressed by the source. This is because opinions can provide valuable insights into the source's perspective, feelings, and potential bias. By examining the opinions expressed, historians can gain a deeper understanding of the source's motivations and the context in which the information was created.
To determine the answer to this question, you can eliminate options C and D because they do not pertain directly to the question being asked. Option C suggests that examining opinions will reveal whether the source is primary or secondary, which is not necessarily related to why historians consider opinions. Option D implies that the opinions will reveal the identity of the source, which may not always be the case.
Option A suggests that a source that historians trust is likely to have true opinions, but this is not a strong reason why historians consider opinions. Trustworthiness does not guarantee correctness or lack of bias.
Option B, on the other hand, directly addresses the reason why historians consider opinions. By analyzing the opinions expressed in a source, historians can gain insights into the source's feelings and potential bias, which in turn can influence how they interpret and use the information provided.
So, the correct answer is B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.