Which of the following best shows the difference between Japanese and Western European feudalism?(1 point)ResponsesWestern Europeans and Japanese both had feudal systems, but they existed at different times, for 1,000 years in Europe and 400 in Japan.Western Europeans and Japanese both had feudal systems, but they existed at different times, for 1,000 years in Europe and 400 in Japan.Military power was more important in Japan, where warriors, such as the daimyo, shogun, and samurai, all showed off their military strength to gain power.Military power was more important in Japan, where warriors, such as the daimyo, shogun, and samurai, all showed off their military strength to gain power.Land ownership was important in both places, but only Western Europe had a system for providing military protection using knights who were granted land.Land ownership was important in both places, but only Western Europe had a system for providing military protection using knights who were granted land.Control of land mattered in both places, but the Japanese focused primarily on controlling their own lands, while Europeans sometimes engaged in wars of conquest.

Question

Which of the following best shows the difference between Japanese and Western European feudalism?(1 point)ResponsesWestern Europeans and Japanese both had feudal systems, but they existed at different times, for 1,000 years in Europe and 400 in Japan.Western Europeans and Japanese both had feudal systems, but they existed at different times, for 1,000 years in Europe and 400 in Japan.Military power was more important in Japan, where warriors, such as the daimyo, shogun, and samurai, all showed off their military strength to gain power.Military power was more important in Japan, where warriors, such as the daimyo, shogun, and samurai, all showed off their military strength to gain power.Land ownership was important in both places, but only Western Europe had a system for providing military protection using knights who were granted land.Land ownership was important in both places, but only Western Europe had a system for providing military protection using knights who were granted land.Control of land mattered in both places, but the Japanese focused primarily on controlling their own lands, while Europeans sometimes engaged in wars of conquest.

Answer 1

Control of land mattered in both places, but the Japanese focused primarily on controlling their own lands, while Europeans sometimes engaged in wars of conquest.

Answer 2

The best answer that shows the difference between Japanese and Western European feudalism is:

Control of land mattered in both places, but the Japanese focused primarily on controlling their own lands, while Europeans sometimes engaged in wars of conquest.

Answer 3

To determine which of the following options best shows the difference between Japanese and Western European feudalism, let's analyze each option:

1. "Western Europeans and Japanese both had feudal systems, but they existed at different times, for 1,000 years in Europe and 400 in Japan."
This option highlights the difference in the duration of feudal systems between Europe and Japan, with Europe having a longer-lasting feudal system. However, it does not specifically address the differences in the systems themselves, so this option may not be the best choice.

2. "Military power was more important in Japan, where warriors, such as the daimyo, shogun, and samurai, all showed off their military strength to gain power."
This option points out that military power played a significant role in Japanese feudalism, with warriors showcasing their military strength to gain power. This indicates a key difference compared to Western European feudalism, where other factors could be more important than purely military strength. This option appears to be a better choice as it focuses on a specific difference in the two feudal systems.

3. "Land ownership was important in both places, but only Western Europe had a system for providing military protection using knights who were granted land."
This option highlights the importance of land ownership in both Japanese and Western European feudalism. However, it specifically points out that only Western Europe had a system involving knights being granted land for military protection. This difference suggests that Western European feudalism had a specific structure related to land ownership and military protection that was distinct from Japanese feudalism.

4. "Control of land mattered in both places, but the Japanese focused primarily on controlling their own lands, while Europeans sometimes engaged in wars of conquest."
This option emphasizes that land control was significant in both Japanese and Western European feudalism. However, it also underscores a difference in focus, with the Japanese primarily concentrating on controlling their own lands, while Europeans occasionally engaged in wars of conquest. This distinction suggests that the motivations and strategies behind land control differed between the two regions.

Considering these explanations, option 2, "Military power was more important in Japan, where warriors, such as the daimyo, shogun, and samurai, all showed off their military strength to gain power," appears to best show the difference between Japanese and Western European feudalism.