Which of the following is a reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source?
A. A source that historians trust is likely to have true opinions.
B. The opinions may provide clues to the sources's feelings and possible bias.
C. Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source.
D. The opinions will reveal the identity of the source.
B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.
The correct answer is B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias. Examining and considering the opinions expressed by a source can give historians insights into the perspective and bias of the source, which can help determine its reliability and accuracy.
The correct answer is B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias. Historians consider opinions reported by a source in addition to facts because opinions can offer insights into the source's perspective, emotions, and potential biases. Examining opinions allows historians to understand the subjective interpretation and personal beliefs that may have influenced the source's account of events. This aids in the critical analysis and evaluation of historical sources, enabling historians to gain a more nuanced understanding of the past. By considering both facts and opinions, historians can form a well-rounded interpretation of historical events.
