Which male duty was seen as the most virtuous in Roman society?(1 point)
Responses
Selling any children that were seen as unfit into slavery.
Selling any children that were seen as unfit into slavery.
Continuing the family name through sons.
Continuing the family name through sons.
Owning all of the family's property.
Owning all of the family's property.
Allowing their wives to participate in government.
Continuing the family name through sons.
Continuing the family name through sons was seen as the most virtuous male duty in Roman society.
The most virtuous male duty in Roman society was seen to be continuing the family name through sons. To arrive at this answer, we can evaluate the options provided and consider the cultural values of Roman society during that time.
The first option, selling any children that were seen as unfit into slavery, is not a virtuous duty but rather a cruel practice. Romans valued the importance of family and protecting their children, so this action would not be seen as virtuous.
The second option, owning all of the family's property, does not necessarily reflect a virtuous duty. While property ownership was important in Roman society, it does not specifically address the idea of virtue.
The fourth option, allowing their wives to participate in government, was not a dominant cultural norm in Roman society. The roles of men and women were clearly defined, and men were typically the ones involved in political affairs. While gender roles and expectations have varied across different societies and time periods, in this case, allowing wives to participate in government would not have been seen as the most virtuous male duty in Roman society.
Therefore, out of the options provided, the answer is that continuing the family name through sons was considered the most virtuous male duty in Roman society. This involved producing male heirs to carry on the family lineage, preserve the family name, and maintain ancestral traditions and property.