In 2011, a government commission in Chile approved a $7 billion project. The money was for the construction of five dams across two rivers. Supporters of the dams said that Chile needed them. The dams would help the country grow out of poverty. Opponents, however, pointed out that the dams would have damaged untouched wilderness areas. In 2012, the Supreme Court in Chile blocked the project. The court wanted more research into the dams' impact. Opponents of the dams believe that Chile should develop other forms of energy. The year-round sun of its northern deserts is ideal for producing solar power. Chile could also harness wind power from the gusts along its long Pacific coast.
Do It!
Opponents want the government to consider _________.
Press enter to interact with the item, and press tab button or down arrow until reaching the Submit button once the item is selected
A alternatives
B discounts
C laborers
D regulations
A alternatives
A alternatives
The correct answer is A) alternatives.
To arrive at this answer, let's break down the information provided. In the given passage, opponents of the dams in Chile believe that the country should develop other forms of energy. It mentions that Chile has abundant resources like the year-round sun in its northern deserts, which is ideal for producing solar power, and the gusts along its long Pacific coast, which can be harnessed for wind power.
By considering this context, the opponents are calling for the government to explore alternative forms of energy rather than pursuing the construction of the dams. Therefore, the answer is A) alternatives.