Explain the responsibilities of the judicial branch.(1 point)ResponsesThe judicial branch is required to interpret the meaning of the laws and provide a ruling on court cases.The judicial branch is required to interpret the meaning of the laws and provide a ruling on court cases.The judicial branch is required to make laws for all citizens to follow.The judicial branch is required to make laws for all citizens to follow.The judicial branch creates the rule of law in the United States.The judicial branch creates the rule of law in the United States.The judicial branch carries out the laws.The judicial branch carries out the laws.
The responsibilities of the judicial branch include interpreting the meaning of laws and providing a ruling on court cases. They do not make laws for all citizens to follow, as that is the role of the legislative branch. Additionally, it is the legislative branch that creates the rule of law in the United States, not the judicial branch. The executive branch is responsible for carrying out the laws, not the judicial branch.
Which phrase describes the level of the district court?(1 point)Responsesthe court of appeals that is second in the federal court systemthe court of appeals that is second in the federal court systemthe starting point for any case in federal courtthe starting point for any case in federal courtwhen the plaintiff and defendant reside in different stateswhen the plaintiff and defendant reside in different statesthe highest court in the federal court system
The phrase "the starting point for any case in federal court" describes the level of the district court.
Compare the standard of proof for civil and criminal cases.(1 point)ResponsesThe standard of proof is lower in a criminal case.The standard of proof is lower in a criminal case.The standard of proof changes in both criminal and civil cases based on the type of case.The standard of proof changes in both criminal and civil cases based on the type of case.The standard of proof in a civil case is decided by the jury, while in a criminal case it is decided by the judge.The standard of proof in a civil case is decided by the jury, while in a criminal case it is decided by the judge.The standard of proof is higher in a criminal case.
The standard of proof is higher in a criminal case.
Which answer best defines the power given to the Supreme Court in regard to original and appellate jurisdiction?(1 point)ResponsesThe Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over any case involving constitutional law or federal statutes and has appellate jurisdiction from lower courts.The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over any case involving constitutional law or federal statutes and has appellate jurisdiction from lower courts.The Supreme Court is only provided appellate jurisdiction if the case has previously been heard in a lower court.The Supreme Court is only provided appellate jurisdiction if the case has previously been heard in a lower court.The Supreme Court is only provided original jurisdiction and is not able to hear appeals on a case.The Supreme Court is only provided original jurisdiction and is not able to hear appeals on a case.The Supreme Court has complete jurisdiction in all cases at a state and federal level.
The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over any case involving constitutional law or federal statutes and has appellate jurisdiction from lower courts.
What term describes the Supreme Court’s power to determine whether the actions of the legislative branch or the executive branch are constitutional?(1 point)Responseswrit of certiorariwrit of certiorarilimited jurisdictionlimited jurisdictionrule of fourrule of fourjudicial review
The term that describes the Supreme Court's power to determine whether the actions of the legislative branch or the executive branch are constitutional is "judicial review."
Which answer best explains the power of judicial review used by the Supreme Court to resolve policy differences?(1 point)Responsesthe power to nominate members of Congress for their termsthe power to nominate members of Congress for their termsthe power to impeach a president for unconstitutional executive ordersthe power to impeach a president for unconstitutional executive ordersthe power to assist the executive and legislative branches in the creation of policiesthe power to assist the executive and legislative branches in the creation of policiesthe power to determine whether acts by the legislative and executive branches are constitutional
The power to determine whether acts by the legislative and executive branches are constitutional is the best explanation of the power of judicial review used by the Supreme Court to resolve policy differences.
Which item gives the Supreme Court the ability to resolve policy differences between the branches?(1 point)Responseswrit of mandamuswrit of mandamusjudicial reviewjudicial reviewexecutive orderexecutive orderthe Constitution
The item that gives the Supreme Court the ability to resolve policy differences between the branches is "judicial review."
Which statement best explains the power of judicial review held by the Supreme Court?(1 point)Responsesthe review of congressional or presidential acts to make sure they are constitutionalthe review of congressional or presidential acts to make sure they are constitutionalthe review of acts of Congress to make sure they are constitutionalthe review of acts of Congress to make sure they are constitutionalthe review of executive orders issues by the president to make sure they are constitutionalthe review of executive orders issues by the president to make sure they are constitutionalthe review of all laws within the United States at any level to make sure they are constitutionalthe review of all laws within the United States at any level to make sure they are constitutional
The statement "the review of congressional or presidential acts to make sure they are constitutional" best explains the power of judicial review held by the Supreme Court.
In analyzing the role of the Supreme Court in making laws, what Supreme Court case is an example of how society’s contemporary norms and mores shape how justices viewed the law?(1 point)ResponsesPlessy v. FergusonPlessy v. FergusonMarbury v. MadisonMarbury v. MadisonMahanoy Area School District v. B.LMahanoy Area School District v. B.LWest Virginia v. BarnettWest Virginia v. Barnett
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. is an example of a Supreme Court case that demonstrates how society's contemporary norms and mores shape how justices viewed the law.
Analyze the Constitution’s role in preventing bias from affecting the lawmaking efforts of the Supreme Court. How does the Constitution address this?(1 point)ResponsesThe president appoints Supreme Court justices.The president appoints Supreme Court justices.The Senate appoints Supreme Court justices.The Senate appoints Supreme Court justices.The people elect Supreme Court justices.The people elect Supreme Court justices.The state legislatures appoint Supreme Court justices.
The Constitution's role in preventing bias from affecting the lawmaking efforts of the Supreme Court is that the president, with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoints Supreme Court justices. This appointment process is designed to be impartial and allows for a separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches. By involving both the president and the Senate in the appointment process, it serves as a check and balance to prevent any one individual or group from having complete control over the selection of justices. This helps to ensure that bias and undue influence are minimized in the selection of Supreme Court justices, thereby promoting a fair and independent judiciary.
