Which BEST explains why it is hard to tell what kind of 3D art prehistoric societies had?
• Prehistoric societies were focused on survival and had little use for art.
• Many materials used to make art dissolve over time.
• It is very hard to get any information about prehistoric societies.
• Prehistoric societies didn't value 3D art, so they didn't create it.
Many materials used to make art dissolve over time.
The best explanation for why it is hard to determine what kind of 3D art prehistoric societies had is that many materials used to make art dissolve over time. Over the years, natural processes like erosion, decay, and human activities can cause materials such as wood, clay, and organic pigments to deteriorate and disappear. Therefore, it becomes challenging to find well-preserved examples of prehistoric 3D art.
The best explanation for why it is hard to tell what kind of 3D art prehistoric societies had is that many materials used to make art dissolve over time. To understand this, we need to consider the preservation of archaeological artifacts.
When studying prehistoric societies, archaeologists rely on the discovery and analysis of artifacts left behind by those societies. However, the passage of time and environmental factors can cause the deterioration and destruction of these artifacts. Many materials commonly used in the creation of art, such as wood, organic fibers, and animal bones, are particularly susceptible to decay and decompose relatively quickly.
Due to this inherent fragility, a large number of prehistoric 3D artworks have not survived until present times. As a result, it becomes challenging for researchers to determine with certainty what kind of 3D art prehistoric societies created. The limited availability of well-preserved artifacts makes it difficult to form a comprehensive understanding of the artistic practices of these ancient civilizations.
While it is true that prehistoric societies were focused on survival and may have had little use for art compared to their essential needs, this alone does not fully explain the difficulty in identifying their 3D art. Additionally, the assertion that prehistoric societies didn't value 3D art and therefore didn't create it is unsupported by evidence. Artistic expression has been an intrinsic part of human culture since ancient times, regardless of the extent to which it was valued or appreciated in different societies.
Furthermore, the statement that it is very hard to get any information about prehistoric societies is also true to some extent. As with any historical study, obtaining information about ancient cultures can be challenging due to the lack of written records and the limitations of the available archaeological evidence. However, this difficulty in obtaining information does not solely account for the challenge of identifying prehistoric 3D art.
In summary, the primary reason it is hard to determine what kind of 3D art prehistoric societies had is the limited preservation of materials that were used to create artworks. The perishable nature of many art materials has resulted in the scarcity of surviving artifacts, making it challenging for researchers to gain a comprehensive understanding of prehistoric artistic practices.