who argues with The impact of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education summary with a reference
One argument regarding the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education is that it can improve learning experiences and outcomes for students. This argument suggests that AI technologies can personalize learning, provide instant feedback, and offer adaptive learning solutions to cater to individual student needs (Gibson, Ostashewski, & Flintoff, 2019). AI can analyze vast amounts of data to understand student patterns, preferences, and performance, enabling educators to customize instruction accordingly. This level of personalization can enhance student engagement and knowledge retention.
Reference:
Gibson, D., Ostashewski, N., & Flintoff, K. (2019). Artificial intelligence and higher education: revolutionary or evolutionary change? Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1-14.
One person who argues with the impact of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education is David M. Perry, a journalist and historian. In his article titled "Why I'm Skeptical About the Promise of AI in Higher Education," published in The Chronicle of Higher Education, Perry expresses concerns about the potential drawbacks of integrating artificial intelligence in the field of higher education.
Perry argues that while AI has the potential to provide personalized learning experiences and improve efficiency in areas such as grading and course management, it may also exacerbate existing educational inequalities. He points out that AI algorithms are not neutral and can be biased, perpetuating social, economic, and racial disparities. Furthermore, he questions the ability of AI to truly understand the complexities of human learning and argues that the use of AI might devalue the role of human educators.
To support his argument, Perry references studies that have highlighted the biases present in AI algorithms and recounts instances where AI systems have failed to understand context or produce accurate results. He also cites concerns raised by educators about the potential loss of critical thinking, creativity, and empathy when relying heavily on AI for educational purposes.
Overall, Perry's argument against the impact of AI in higher education revolves around the potential pitfalls and unintended consequences of relying too heavily on artificial intelligence without considering its limitations and biases.
To find someone who argues against the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education, you can follow these steps:
1. Start by conducting a general search using search engines such as Google or Bing. Use keywords like "counterarguments against AI in higher education" or "critics of AI impact in higher education."
2. Look for specific articles, research papers, or even blog posts that discuss perspectives against the impact of AI in higher education. These sources are likely to present counterarguments and provide evidence to support their claims.
3. Pay attention to the credibility of the authors or organizations behind the sources you find. Look for reputable individuals, educational institutes, or industry experts who have published work in the field of education or AI.
4. Once you find a specific source, ensure it provides a reference or citation to support the arguments made against the impact of AI in higher education. References could include other academic papers, research studies, or statistics that back up the claims.
5. Analyze the arguments carefully, consider the evidence provided, and critically assess the credibility and validity of the claims made against the impact of AI in higher education.
Remember, finding an opposing view helps to gain a comprehensive understanding of a topic, even if it differs from the mainstream opinion.