Which statement best compares and contrasts the Bill of Rights with the Declaration of Independence?(1 point)

Responses

The Bill of Rights emphasizes the freedom of religion because the king had denied colonists the right to worship freely.
The Bill of Rights emphasizes the freedom of religion because the king had denied colonists the right to worship freely.

The Bill of Rights emphasizes the rights of those accused of crimes because the king often jailed political enemies without a trial.
The Bill of Rights emphasizes the rights of those accused of crimes because the king often jailed political enemies without a trial.

The Bill of Rights emphasizes protection of individual rights that the king had denied American colonists, but it also provides a framework for government.
The Bill of Rights emphasizes protection of individual rights that the king had denied American colonists, but it also provides a framework for government.

The Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence both sought to establish fair and even divisions of power within government.

The Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence both sought to establish fair and even divisions of power within government.

Summarize the rights contained in the Sixth Amendment.(1 point)

Responses

the part of the Bill of Rights that protects religious liberty and freedom of expression such as speech
the part of the Bill of Rights that protects religious liberty and freedom of expression such as speech

the part of the Bill of Rights that protects the individual and state rights to own weapons for the purpose of creating militias
the part of the Bill of Rights that protects the individual and state rights to own weapons for the purpose of creating militias

the part of the Bill of Rights that protects people accused of a crime by requiring a grand jury, prohibiting trials for the same crime twice, preventing self-incrimination, and prohibiting the taking of private property without compensation
the part of the Bill of Rights that protects people accused of a crime by requiring a grand jury, prohibiting trials for the same crime twice, preventing self-incrimination, and prohibiting the taking of private property without compensation

the part of the Bill of Rights that protects people accused of a crime by requiring a speedy and public trial, requiring an impartial jury, identifying the specific crime committed, making witness testimony public, and providing a lawyer for the accused

The Sixth Amendment protects people accused of a crime by requiring a grand jury, prohibiting trials for the same crime twice, preventing self-incrimination, and prohibiting the taking of private property without compensation. It also guarantees the right to a speedy and public trial, an impartial jury, and the assistance of a lawyer for the accused.

Read the following excerpt from the Supreme Court decision in the Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller. Explain how the Supreme Court interprets the Second Amendment as it relates to personal liberties and the government’s need to pass laws protecting the safety of society.

“Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

(1 point)
Responses

The Supreme Court argued that the importance of personal liberty to possess a weapon far outreaches concern over safety.
The Supreme Court argued that the importance of personal liberty to possess a weapon far outreaches concern over safety.

The Supreme Court argued that previous court decisions restricting personal ownership of firearms should be vacated.
The Supreme Court argued that previous court decisions restricting personal ownership of firearms should be vacated.

The Supreme Court argued that government has the right to pass laws restricting the possession of firearms when that possession may lead to a danger to society.
The Supreme Court argued that government has the right to pass laws restricting the possession of firearms when that possession may lead to a danger to society.

The Supreme Court argued that society safety concerns always outweigh the need for the personal right to carry a firearm.

The Supreme Court argued that government has the right to pass laws restricting the possession of firearms when that possession may lead to a danger to society.

The correct statement that best compares and contrasts the Bill of Rights with the Declaration of Independence is: The Bill of Rights emphasizes protection of individual rights that the king had denied American colonists, but it also provides a framework for government.

The Declaration of Independence, on the other hand, focuses on the colonists' grievances against the British monarchy and their right to establish a new government based on the principles of equality, life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. It does not provide specific protections for individual rights like the Bill of Rights does.

The correct response is: The Bill of Rights emphasizes protection of individual rights that the king had denied American colonists, but it also provides a framework for government.

To arrive at this answer, let's compare and contrast the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of Independence was a document that announced the colonies' decision to separate from British rule. It listed grievances against the British King and asserted the rights of the colonists to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

On the other hand, the Bill of Rights is a set of amendments that were added to the United States Constitution after its ratification. It guarantees certain individual rights and liberties, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial. These rights were included to address the concerns about potential government abuses and to protect individual freedoms that the colonists felt were denied by the British monarchy.

Option 3, "The Bill of Rights emphasizes protection of individual rights that the king had denied American colonists, but it also provides a framework for government," best compares and contrasts the two documents. It acknowledges that the Bill of Rights addresses the king's denial of individual rights while also recognizing that it establishes a framework for the American government.