Which option correctly identifies a result of agricultural practices? (1 point)
Responses
water diversion
water diversion
soil erosion
soil erosion
biodiversity
biodiversity
slash and burn agriculture
All of the above options are correct.
Which option correctly identifies a result of agricultural practices? (1 point)
All of the above options are correct.
I have to pick one bruh
bruh i got it wrong thanks
Which of the following critiques of forestry’s impact on the physical environment is a positive effect?(1 point)
To clarify, a critique typically refers to a negative assessment or criticism. Therefore, it would be incorrect to label any critique as a positive effect. If you are asking for a positive effect of forestry on the physical environment, some examples could include:
- Reduced soil erosion due to the presence of trees and their root systems holding the soil in place.
- Promotion of water conservation and improved water quality through trees intercepting rainfall and filtering pollutants from runoff.
- Carbon sequestration by forests, helping to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate change.
Please let me know if you need further clarification or if you have another question.
Which of the following critiques of forestry’s impact on the physical environment is a positive effect?(1 point)
Responses
Forestry can lead to the removal of carbon sinks.
Forestry can lead to the removal of carbon sinks.
Low regulation of fires increases the amount of slash and burn agriculture that occurs.
Low regulation of fires increases the amount of slash and burn agriculture that occurs.
Deforestation can cause soil erosion and landslides.
Deforestation can cause soil erosion and landslides.
Recreational use can engage more people with forest conservation.
The response that identifies a positive effect of forestry's impact on the physical environment is: "Recreational use can engage more people with forest conservation."
Question
Which statement best explains what happened to wetland resources and ecosystem services after the 1970s in the U.S.?(1 point)
Responses
The Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act, passed in 1980, required the destruction of all wetlands throughout the U.S.
The Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act, passed in 1980, required the destruction of all wetlands throughout the U.S.
Flooding due to wetlands led to a decrease in the number of wetlands.
Flooding due to wetlands led to a decrease in the number of wetlands.
Increased knowledge of the role of wetlands in preserving ecosystem services led to policies to restore and protect wetlands.
Increased knowledge of the role of wetlands in preserving ecosystem services led to policies to restore and protect wetlands.
Wetlands began to deplete groundwater, leading to policies that favored draining wetlands.