Which of the following is a reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source?

(1 point)

Historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source to gain insight into the perspective, biases, and motivations of the individuals or groups involved in the events being studied. Opinions can provide a deeper understanding of the context, attitudes, and beliefs of the time period, helping historians analyze and interpret the information more comprehensively.

One reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source is that opinions can provide insight into the mindset and perspectives of the individuals living during that time period. This can help historians understand the motivations and beliefs that shaped historical events. Additionally, opinions can reveal biases or agendas held by the source, which can inform the historian's analysis of the source's credibility and potential bias. By considering both opinions and facts, historians can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the past.