The scientific method is sometimes seen as more of a cycle than a linear process. Which statement gives a major reason for this?

The scientific method is often seen as more of a cycle than a linear process because it involves repeated iterations of experimentation, observation, and analysis. New information and observations can lead to new hypotheses, which then need to be tested through experimentation. Data and results from experiments may also lead to the modification or refinement of previously established theories or hypotheses. Therefore, the scientific method is viewed as a continuous process of inquiry and discovery, rather than a linear sequence of steps.

The scientific method is often seen as more of a cycle than a linear process because the steps of the method are not always followed in a strict, sequential order. Instead, scientists often go back and forth between different stages of the method as they gather new data, revise their hypotheses, or design additional experiments. This cyclical nature allows scientists to continually refine and improve their understanding of a particular phenomenon or problem.