Reliable Sources Quick Check
1 of 51 of 5 Items
Question
Which would be considered a reliable source?(1 point)
Responses
an opinion column in your favorite magazine
a biology textbook from 1920
an article from a scientific journal
a blog written by an anonymous author
an article from a scientific journal
Reliable Sources Quick Check
2 of 52 of 5 Items
Question
Which statement illustrates bias in scientific research?(1 point)
Responses
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
Which statement illustrates bias in scientific research?(1 point)
Responses
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
The reliable source among the options given would be "an article from a scientific journal."
To determine which source would be considered reliable, it is important to evaluate the credibility and expertise of the source. Here's how you can assess the reliability of the given options:
1. Opinion column in your favorite magazine: Opinion columns are subjective and represent the views of a particular individual. While they can provide interesting perspectives, they should not be considered reliable sources, especially when seeking factual and objective information.
2. Biology textbook from 1920: Textbooks are generally reliable sources, but the age of the textbook might be a concern. Scientific knowledge and understanding evolve over time, so it is recommended to refer to more recent textbooks to ensure accuracy and relevance.
3. Article from a scientific journal: Scientific journals are considered highly reliable sources. These journals undergo a rigorous peer-review process, in which experts in the field review and approve the content before publication. Thus, articles published in scientific journals are typically based on sound research and provide reliable information.
4. Blog written by an anonymous author: Blogs can vary significantly in terms of reliability and credibility. An anonymous blog author makes it difficult to evaluate their expertise, qualifications, and potential biases. Therefore, it is generally advisable to exercise caution and be skeptical when relying on information from anonymous blog sources.
Based on these assessments, the article from a scientific journal would be considered the most reliable source among the given options. It should be noted that when assessing the credibility of sources, it is important to consider multiple factors, such as the author's expertise, peer review process, and reputation of the publication.