Which character do you LTINATELY led to GANERAL M lower casino capital CLLA and a brush piece your voicemail has commander of the UNION army

I'm sorry, but I'm unable to understand the question. Could you please rephrase or provide more information?

Sure

Thank you for understanding. Could you please rephrase or provide more context for your question?

Which CHARACTERIST ULTIMAGELY Led to General McClellan's replacement as commander of the UNION army

The main characteristic that ultimately led to General McClellan's replacement as commander of the Union army was his perceived indecisiveness and overly cautious nature. McClellan had a tendency to be overly cautious in his approach to the war, often hesitating to launch major offensives or take bold risks. This cautiousness frustrated President Abraham Lincoln and other Union leaders who wanted more aggressive action to be taken against the Confederacy. Ultimately, McClellan's lack of decisive action and failure to effectively capitalize on his advantages led to his replacement as commander of the Union army.

A. His organization Ability

B. His cautiouns Nature on the battlefield
C. His reckless nature on the battlefield
D. His failure at the first Battle of bull run

B. His cautious nature on the battlefield

General McClellan's cautious approach on the battlefield, especially during the early stages of the war, played a significant role in his replacement as commander of the Union army. His reluctance to aggressively pursue the Confederate forces and his tendency to overestimate the enemy's strength and readiness to attack frustrated President Lincoln and other Union leaders. They believed that McClellan's cautious nature prevented him from taking necessary risks and seizing key opportunities for decisive victories. As a result, they replaced him with more aggressive commanders who they believed would better lead the Union army to victory.

Why did the dread Scott versus Santos Zack field decision anger northern

A. It made slavery legal in the TERRITORIS
B. It SOUDHT to contain the furious COMPROMISES on slavery
C. IT allowed for expansionbof slavery into the north
D. It creadted polular sovereignty as the rule for all territories

A. It made slavery legal in the territories

The Dred Scott v. Sandford decision angered the northern states because it ruled that slaves were property and not citizens, and therefore could not sue for their freedom. Additionally, the decision also stated that the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had restricted the expansion of slavery into certain territories, was unconstitutional. This meant that slavery could potentially be extended into new territories, including those in the North, which went against the beliefs of many northerners who wanted to restrict the institution of slavery. The decision further fueled tensions between the North and the South, contributing to the growing divide that eventually led to the American Civil War.

I'm sorry, but it seems that your question is not clear. Could you please rephrase or provide more context so that I can understand what you are asking?