fix grammar
The dataset displays the trial result for the volume of hydrogen gas production with 5 differing concentrations of H2SO4, measured by gas syringe. This was than calculated and graphed using dataset’s average gas production and rate of reaction, revealing significance from differing concentration of sulfuric acid.
As observed, 1,5M of concentration had a larger percentage of uncertainty which may lead to unstable result while 0.1M of concentration shows not much of difference between typical values. However, neither of the concentration had no clear outliers nor average thus additional trials were required to overcome this constraint. The general pattern of this graph is higher the concentration of sulfuric acid generates higher volume of hydrogen gas and rate of reaction to occur. Both figure 1 and 2 represent positive correlation as the result of concentration results to rate of reaction (mL/s), (0.1M-0.1729M/s, 0.5M-0.4209M/s, 0.75M-0.6433M/s, 1M-0.8347M/s, and1.5M-1.0966M/s). Moreover, the R^2 of both of the graph is 0.9915 and 0.9912 which is very close to the value 1 indicates that the trend line is extremely accurate.
The dataset displays the trial results for the volume of hydrogen gas production with five different concentrations of H2SO4, measured by gas syringe. This was then calculated and graphed using the dataset's average gas production and rate of reaction, revealing differences in the concentration of sulfuric acid.
As observed, a concentration of 1.5M had a larger percentage of uncertainty, which may lead to unstable results, while a concentration of 0.1M showed little difference between typical values. However, neither of the concentrations had clear outliers or averages, thus additional trials were required to overcome this constraint. The general pattern of this graph is that a higher concentration of sulfuric acid generates a larger volume of hydrogen gas and a higher rate of reaction. Both Figure 1 and 2 represent a positive correlation, as the concentration of sulfuric acid results in a higher rate of reaction (0.1M-0.1729M/s, 0.5M-0.4209M/s, 0.75M-0.6433M/s, 1M-0.8347M/s, and 1.5M-1.0966M/s). Moreover, the R^2 of both graphs is 0.9915 and 0.9912, which is very close to the value of 1, indicating that the trend line is extremely accurate.
The grammar can be fixed as follows:
The dataset displays the trial results for the volume of hydrogen gas production with 5 differing concentrations of H2SO4, measured by a gas syringe. This was then calculated and graphed using the dataset's average gas production and rate of reaction, revealing significance from the differing concentrations of sulfuric acid.
As observed, a concentration of 1.5M had a larger percentage of uncertainty, which may lead to unstable results, while a concentration of 0.1M showed not much difference between typical values. However, neither of the concentrations had clear outliers or an average; thus, additional trials were required to overcome this constraint.
The general pattern of this graph is that a higher concentration of sulfuric acid generates a higher volume of hydrogen gas and rate of reaction. Both Figure 1 and 2 represent a positive correlation, as the concentration results in a rate of reaction of (0.1M-0.1729M/s, 0.5M-0.4209M/s, 0.75M-0.6433M/s, 1M-0.8347M/s, and 1.5M-1.0966M/s). Moreover, the R^2 of both graphs is 0.9915 and 0.9912, which is very close to the value 1, indicating that the trend line is extremely accurate.