Yes, the flexibility of laws is more commonly associated with soft sciences compared to hard sciences. Soft sciences, such as social sciences or psychology, often deal with complex and dynamic phenomena that are influenced by a variety of factors. As a result, the laws or principles in soft sciences are generally more flexible and subject to interpretation and change. In contrast, hard sciences, like physics or chemistry, often have highly rigid and precise laws that can be mathematically formulated and predictably applied.
The characteristic of laws not being very rigid is typically associated with the field of soft science. Soft science disciplines, such as sociology and psychology, study complex and dynamic human behaviors and social systems. In these fields, laws or principles are often subject to various interpretations and are influenced by numerous contextual factors. Consequently, the findings of soft science are often more nuanced and flexible compared to the rigid laws found in natural sciences like physics or chemistry.
