Briefly explain the meaning of the ieusdem generis rule and name the leading
case illustrating the rule.
The ieusdem generis rule is a legal principle which applies when a list of specific items or things is followed by a general term. This principle states that the general term should be interpreted as being limited to things or items of the same kind, nature, or category as the specific ones listed. In other words, the general term should be interpreted in light of the specific items listed.
For example, if a statute prohibits the carrying of "knives, daggers, swords and other deadly weapons," the ieusdem generis rule would require that the term "deadly weapons" be interpreted as being limited to items that are similar in nature and purpose to knives, daggers, and swords.
The leading case illustrating this rule is Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse Co Ltd.
The "ieusdem generis" rule is a legal principle used to interpret ambiguous words or phrases in a statute. It states that when a general term is followed by a specific list of examples, the general term should be interpreted to include only those things that are of the same kind or nature as the specific examples.
The leading case illustrating the ieusdem generis rule is Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse Co Ltd [1899] AC 143. In this case, the House of Lords held that the phrase "other place of public resort for the time being" in a Betting Act should be interpreted to include only places of the same kind or nature as a racecourse, and not any type of public resort.