Keiko takes a video of a nearby river during each season. Which part of the video proves that the river is nonliving?(1 point)
Responses
The river requires no resources to exist.
The river grew larger when it flooded in the spring.
Part of the river changed in winter when it froze.
Parts of the river move quickly.
None of the options provided prove that the river is nonliving. The river is a natural feature and is considered a living part of the ecosystem.
Carla, Dude are you a bot or something?
The part of the video that proves that the river is nonliving is: "The river requires no resources to exist."
To determine which part of the video proves that the river is nonliving, we need to analyze the provided responses.
1. "The river requires no resources to exist": This response does not directly indicate whether the river is nonliving or not, as it only mentions the river's resource requirement. It does not provide evidence regarding the river's life status.
2. "The river grew larger when it flooded in the spring": This response suggests that the river is living, as it shows growth and change based on external factors like flooding. Therefore, it does not indicate that the river is nonliving.
3. "Part of the river changed in winter when it froze": This response suggests that the river is nonliving. The fact that the river freezes during the winter demonstrates a physical change that is common for nonliving objects, indicating that it is not alive.
4. "Parts of the river move quickly": This response does not directly indicate whether the river is living or nonliving. The movement of parts of the river can occur in both living and nonliving entities, so it does not definitively prove the river's life status.
Based on the provided responses, the part of the video that best proves that the river is nonliving is when it changes in winter and freezes.