A student has written an argument in favor of requiring all citizens to vote. The student wants to revise the argument to make sure it has clear reasons and supporting evidence. Which sentence should be removed from the argument because it does NOT provide strong evidence?
A.
Required voting has worked successfully in Australia.
B.
I believe that voting is not only a right but also a responsibility.
C.
Research has shown that more people vote when citizens are required to vote.
D.
Only about half of eligible citizens usually vote in national elections.
The sentence that should be removed from the argument because it does NOT provide strong evidence is B. "I believe that voting is not only a right but also a responsibility". This sentence is an opinion that does not provide any supporting evidence or facts.
D. Only about half of eligible citizens usually vote in national elections.
The sentence that should be removed from the argument because it does NOT provide strong evidence is B. "I believe that voting is not only a right but also a responsibility." This sentence represents the student's personal opinion rather than providing concrete evidence or data to support the argument.
To determine which sentence should be removed from the argument, we need to evaluate each sentence based on its strength as evidence.
Sentence A states that required voting has worked successfully in Australia. This is a strong piece of evidence because it presents a real-life example of a country where mandatory voting has been implemented and has been effective. This sentence provides clear supporting evidence.
Sentence B states the student's personal belief that voting is not only a right but also a responsibility. While this sentence does not provide empirical evidence or statistics, it does present the student's viewpoint on the matter, which can be considered as a subjective piece of evidence. Although it may not be as strong as statistical evidence or real-life examples, it still offers some support to the argument.
Sentence C states that research has shown that more people vote when citizens are required to vote. This is another strong piece of evidence as it refers to research that suggests mandatory voting leads to increased voter turnout. This supports the argument and provides a clear reason.
Sentence D states that only about half of eligible citizens usually vote in national elections. While this is a factual statement, it does not explicitly support the argument for requiring all citizens to vote. It merely highlights the low voter turnout, but it does not provide a clear reason or evidence in favor of mandatory voting. Therefore, this sentence should be removed from the argument as it does not provide strong evidence.
In conclusion, the sentence that should be removed from the argument because it does not provide strong evidence is Sentence D: "Only about half of eligible citizens usually vote in national elections."