the kansas nebraska act continues the idea of which of the following
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 continued the idea of popular sovereignty, which allowed the settlers of a territory to decide whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. This idea had been introduced in the Compromise of 1850, which allowed for the admission of California as a free state and the establishment of the territories of New Mexico and Utah with the question of slavery left to popular sovereignty. The Kansas-Nebraska Act extended this concept to the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, which led to a violent conflict known as "Bleeding Kansas" as pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers fought for control of the territory.
To determine which idea the Kansas-Nebraska Act continues, you'll need to understand the context and goals of the act. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, passed by the U.S. Congress in 1854, was primarily concerned with the organization and governance of territories in the western United States. It specifically focused on the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, but also had larger implications for the issue of slavery in the United States.
To find the answer to your question, you could start by doing some research and reading on the Kansas-Nebraska Act and its historical significance. Consider exploring scholarly articles, books, or reputable online sources that discuss the act in detail. By examining the historical context and the debates surrounding the act, you can gain a better understanding of the ideas it continued.
Some key points to consider are:
1. Popular Sovereignty: The Kansas-Nebraska Act sought to implement the concept of popular sovereignty, which allowed the residents of these territories to decide for themselves whether to permit or prohibit slavery. This idea meant that the residents' votes would determine the status of slavery, rather than the federal government imposing a decision.
2. Expansion of Slavery: The act also directly challenged the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had drawn a geographical line (36°30') prohibiting slavery in territories north of Missouri. The Kansas-Nebraska Act stated that any territory, regardless of its location, could decide for itself whether to allow slavery or not.
Based on these points, you can conclude that the idea the Kansas-Nebraska Act continues is popular sovereignty. It leaves the decision of slavery in the hands of the local residents rather than imposing a federal decision.