Which of the following statements best support the claim that human actions decreased the whooping crane population?(1 point)
Responses
a. The draining of wetlands to build housing, farm, and look for oil and gas has led to the loss of habitats.
b. The sharp decline of Burmese pythons, a predator to the whooping crane, have occurred in areas with high whooping crane populations.
c. The Migratory Bird Treaty Act, signed by Congress, has made hunting whopping cranes illegal.
d. Other bird species such as the California Condor have been placed on the endangered species list.
The statement that best supports the claim that human actions decreased the whooping crane population is:
a. The draining of wetlands to build housing, farm, and look for oil and gas has led to the loss of habitats.
This is because the loss of habitat due to human activities is one of the main reasons for the decline in the whooping crane population.
answers to the quick check are
1. A The draining of wetlands to build housing, farm, and look for oil and gas has led to the loss of habitats.
2.D
Captive-bred whooping cranes have been introduced to natural environments
3.A
The predator population will increase because they will have more food.
The statement that best supports the claim that human actions decreased the whooping crane population is:
a. The draining of wetlands to build housing, farm, and look for oil and gas has led to the loss of habitats.
The statement that best supports the claim that human actions decreased the whooping crane population is option (a): The draining of wetlands to build housing, farm, and look for oil and gas has led to the loss of habitats.
To determine the best answer, we need to analyze how each statement relates to the claim.
Option (a) indicates that the draining of wetlands, which is a result of human actions, has led to the loss of habitats. This loss of habitat directly impacts the whooping crane population by reducing their available nesting and feeding areas. Therefore, this statement provides a clear link between human actions and the decrease in the whooping crane population.
Option (b) mentions a decline in Burmese pythons, which are predators of the whooping crane. However, this statement does not directly indicate any human actions that led to the decrease in the whooping crane population.
Option (c) states that the Migratory Bird Treaty Act has made hunting whooping cranes illegal. While this legislation may protect whooping cranes, it does not necessarily address other human actions that might have caused their population decline.
Option (d) mentions the California Condor being placed on the endangered species list. Although this information is related to endangered bird species, it does not directly explain the decrease in the whooping crane population or human actions causing it.
Therefore, option (a) is the statement that best supports the claim that human actions decreased the whooping crane population because it specifically addresses the loss of habitat due to human activities.