Identify a counterclaim for the following argument.
Driving electric or hybrid cars is the best way to cut down on air pollution.
(1 point)
Responses
Some hybrid car engines produce up to 90 percent fewer harmful emissions than gas-powered car engines.
Some hybrid car engines produce up to 90 percent fewer harmful emissions than gas-powered car engines.
Gas-powered cars are the largest private source of air pollution.
Gas-powered cars are the largest private source of air pollution.
Electric and hybrid cars are designed to last for 12 to 15 years.
Electric and hybrid cars are designed to last for 12 to 15 years.
The government should fund the building of public transportation systems to reduce air pollution.
Im gonna go and do the QC and get the answers brb
The answer is Electric and hybrid cars are designed to last for 12 to 15 years. It is the opposite, therefore, a counterclaim.
A counterclaim for the argument "Driving electric or hybrid cars is the best way to cut down on air pollution" could be:
"Investing in renewable energy and transitioning to a clean energy grid is a more effective approach to reducing air pollution than promoting the use of electric or hybrid cars."
A counterclaim for the argument "Driving electric or hybrid cars is the best way to cut down on air pollution" could be:
Increasing the use of electric and hybrid cars may not be the most effective solution to reducing air pollution, as the production and disposal of their batteries also contribute to environmental pollution.
To identify this counterclaim, one can consider the potential drawbacks or limitations of promoting electric and hybrid cars as the primary solution to reduce air pollution. This could involve considering factors such as the environmental impact of battery production, the reliance on fossil fuels for electricity generation, and the challenges associated with battery disposal and recycling. By critically evaluating these aspects, the counterclaim emerges.