Write the two major internal opposition forces to Tewodros
The two major internal opposition forces to Tewodros were the Oromo people and the Ethiopian nobility. The Oromo people were a large ethnic group in Ethiopia who had been oppressed by the Amhara people, of which Tewodros was a member. The Ethiopian nobility were a powerful group of landowners and aristocrats who had traditionally held power in the country and were opposed to Tewodros' attempts to centralize power and modernize the country.
To identify the two major internal opposition forces to Tewodros, we need to understand the historical context during which Tewodros II was in power. Tewodros II, also known as Emperor Tewodros, ruled Ethiopia from 1855 to 1868. During his reign, he faced considerable internal opposition from various groups.
1. Regional Rulers and Nobles: One major opposition force to Tewodros was comprised of regional rulers and nobles who resented his centralizing policies. Tewodros sought to consolidate power under a centralized monarchy and attempted to bring the regional rulers under his authority. However, many regional rulers resisted his attempts, leading to conflicts and ongoing opposition.
To find specific regional rulers and nobles who opposed Tewodros, historical records and scholarly sources such as books, articles, and academic papers can be valuable resources. Researching the history of Ethiopia during Tewodros' reign and exploring the narratives and accounts of regional rulers and nobles will provide insights into their opposition.
2. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church: Another significant internal opposition force to Tewodros was the Ethiopian Orthodox Church. Tewodros saw the church as a powerful institution that needed to be under his control, and he attempted to subjugate it. This led to disagreements and conflicts with religious leaders.
To find detailed information about the opposition from the Ethiopian Orthodox Church to Tewodros, it is best to refer to historical documents, church records, and academic sources. Researching the role of the church during Tewodros' reign, analyzing primary sources such as letters, accounts, and theological works, and studying the historical context of the relations between the emperor and the church will provide a comprehensive understanding of their opposition.
In summary, the two major internal opposition forces to Tewodros were the regional rulers and nobles who resisted his centralizing policies, as well as the Ethiopian Orthodox Church, which opposed his attempts to control and subjugate the institution. To learn more about these forces, studying historical accounts, referring to primary sources, and researching relevant scholarly publications will provide further insights.
The two major internal opposition forces that emerged against Emperor Tewodros II of Ethiopia were the traditional nobility and the regional governors (Ras).
1. Traditional Nobility: The traditional nobility in Ethiopia had a long-standing history of power and influence in the country. They were composed of the higher-ranking aristocrats who held significant land and influence in various regions. When Tewodros ascended to the throne in 1855, he aimed to centralize power and weaken the authority of the nobles. This led to resentment and opposition from the traditional nobility who were not willing to relinquish their power and privileges to the Emperor. They saw Tewodros as a threat to their interests and actively sought to undermine his rule.
2. Regional Governors (Ras): Another source of opposition to Tewodros came from the regional governors, known as Ras, who held considerable power in their respective regions. These Ras were responsible for governing and commanding their own armies, and they held significant autonomy from the central government. Tewodros aimed to consolidate power by asserting more direct control over these regions, which triggered resistance from the Ras. They objected to Tewodros' attempts to weaken their authority and encroach upon their autonomy. As a result, they became key opponents of Tewodros and played a vital role in the internal opposition against his reign.