Lyman Beecher is making a moral argument by appealing to
A. market economics.
B. Jacksonian democracy.
C. scriptural authority.
D. reformed Protestantism.
I hate when people keep pretending to be Ms. Sue
C. Scriptural Authority.
Correct.
To determine the answer to this question, we need to understand the context and the key concepts involved.
Lyman Beecher was a prominent American clergyman and social reformer in the 19th century, so his moral arguments would likely be grounded in religious beliefs and principles.
Now, let's examine the options presented:
A. Market economics: Beecher's moral argument is unlikely to be based on market economics, as this relates more to economic principles rather than moral ones.
B. Jacksonian democracy: While Beecher lived during the era of Jacksonian democracy, his focus was more on religious and moral issues rather than political systems.
C. Scriptural authority: This choice seems more likely, as Beecher was a minister and his moral arguments would often be based on biblical teachings and scriptural authority. Religious leaders often invoke scriptural authority to build moral arguments.
D. Reformed Protestantism: This option is plausible, as Beecher was a committed Protestant, specifically associated with the Congregationalist and Presbyterian traditions. Reformed Protestants often emphasize the importance of moral values and personal transformation in their teachings.
Based on these considerations, the most likely answer to the question is C. scriptural authority, as Beecher's moral arguments would likely be rooted in religious beliefs and biblical teachings. However, it's important to note that without more specific information about the context of Beecher's argument, we cannot definitively determine the correct answer.